Canada wins softwood ruling, but USA says duties will stay
1BC Civ Forums
1BC Civ Forums
Home      Members   FAQ   Links
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      


««12

Canada wins softwood ruling, but USA says...Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
8/17/2005 1:29 PM


Second Lieutenant

Second Lieutenant

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 12:13 PM


Posts: 1,434
Visits: 3,709

Yes and No jerm, Taxes and Tariffs are two similar yet different issues. Tariffs cause nothing but dead weight loss for both the economy imposing the tariff, and the economy who has it imposed on them. Essentially the US government is stealing money from Canada and its own citizens, causing huge dead weight loss, neither economy will ever be able to recover. Canada loses about 5 billion dollars because of the Tariff, and 100 billion dollars in dead weight loss due to the stop in the flow of money. The USA loses about 100 billion dollars due to the slow down in the flow of money (wood is more expensive, so people who buy wood have less money to spend elsewhere), and the government gains a meagre 5 billion dollars to compensate, seems hardly worth it.

Taxes raise the real price of good, or lower the real income of labourers and firms. Taxes transfer wealth from people to government. Their is still a dead weight loss, but their is also a social gain from the building of roads, hospitals, courthouses, libraries, schools, sewers, and other infrastructure.

Taxes are essential, tariffs are not. A Tariff will never increase social welfare (the tariff revenue comes at the cost of lost tax revenue in the construction industry), and the dead weight losses are completely lost. Taxes cause dead weight lose, yet some of that lose is retrieved through public infrastructure.

8/18/2005 3:03 PM


I am pot

I am potI am potI am potI am potI am potI am potI am potI am pot

Last Seen:
4/4/2006 6:06 PM


Posts: 1,670
Visits: 2,512

Jerm, the businesses still have to deal with those same taxes you do... They also have to deal with these tariffs on top of it. How much would you enjoy the gov't making you pay 5 billion in tariffs above and beyond what you currently make. Actually, thats not even fully correct. You make a product and sell it for $10 dollars. You send billions (10 billion per year) over the border (ya free trade) and thats a huge poriton of your income. The nation you're sending these good too decide that you're price of 10$ is unfair and add 5$ to the price of the product. Your sales instantly drop in half... To compensate you try to reduce prices a bit below 10$, but now with reduced sales you're struggling to keep your head above. This tariff is completely independant of the taxes you already pay.

This issue has the potential of destroying free trade and american/canadian relations:

From this CBC article (cbc = canadian broadcast corp)
"There's been reference to retaliation; I see linkage (with other trade issues) is coming back onto the table," he said, referring to NDP Leader Jack Layton's suggestion Monday that Canada slap an export tax on oil and gas shipments.


and from the same site, slightly different article
NDP Leader Jack Layton has said Canada must play "hardball" with the Americans by imposing export charges on oil and gas. Otherwise, he said, the United States won't take the issue seriously.


Finance Minister Ralph Goodale said Washington has to understand that "Canada takes this very, very seriously."'



As usual, the only spotlight this got in the US is when the annoying canadians on a forum post something about it.
8/20/2005 12:55 PM


Second Lieutenant

Second Lieutenant

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 12:13 PM


Posts: 1,434
Visits: 3,709

And people on this site wonder why Americans are disliked around the world!

Trading with the ‘schoolyard bully'

Who wouldnt be mad if this happened to them :mad: .
8/22/2005 10:22 AM


I am pot

I am potI am potI am potI am potI am potI am potI am potI am pot

Last Seen:
4/4/2006 6:06 PM


Posts: 1,670
Visits: 2,512

Nice article.

At this point, there are no good options. Canada has appealed to the World Trade Organization, which will almost certainly rule in Canada's favour, allowing this country to impose counter-measures to collect the $5-billion in tariffs that the Americans have illegally confiscated.

That ruling won't come until next year, however. And imposing tariffs on wine, orange juice and other American imports, to recoup the $5-billion, would only hurt Canadian consumers.


eeep, not my orange juice... couldn't we go after oil instead?

Conversely, slapping export tariffs on Canadian oil and gas exports to the United States, as some have proposed, would harm that sector of the Canadian economy and enrage the Alberta government.
Ms. Carney believes that Ottawa should order a freeze on all American investments in Canadian energy companies, claiming it is in the interest of national security.

ah, ya. fergot.

Man, this is scary... I don't want to be paying more for the stuff I use.


Side note, at my local grocery store... There are signs to note imports and what country their from on alot of goods. American and Canadian goods aren't differentiated between though and are consider one of the same.
8/24/2005 4:26 PM


I am pot

I am potI am potI am potI am potI am potI am potI am potI am pot

Last Seen:
4/4/2006 6:06 PM


Posts: 1,670
Visits: 2,512

I'm curious if this has hit american media yet, or if it won't until the tarrifs are imposed:

Emerson said Trade Minister Jim Peterson and Finance Minister Ralph Goodale have begun the process of identifying suitable U.S. targets for tariffs.

Goodale was cautious in his comments and Peterson said he could only proceed after a crucial WTO ruling expected next year. Canada has already sought approval for $4.8 billion in retaliatory measures.

Foreign Affairs Minister Pierre Pettigrew appeared to welcome the idea of tariffs and said California wines were being considered as one possible target.

"I do believe that we should do it in a way that will not go to the detriment of other Canadian interests," said Pettigrew, a former trade minister who dealt with the softwood dispute.

"We have to do it in a way that some U.S. interests will ring their senators and congressmen in Washington."

The warnings come one week after the United States announced it would ignore a decision by a NAFTA panel that found Canadian lumber exports posed no threat of injury to U.S. producers.

With more that 80 per cent of Canadian exports going to the U.S. and the countries exchanging $1 billion each day, Canada would need to tread carefully to avoid a crippling trade war.
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

««12

Reading This TopicExpand / Collapse
Active Users: 0 (0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
No members currently viewing this topic.
Forum Moderators: Admin, Sean, Zone, Winner, maniacalmonkey, Comedy Dave, cleopatra143, RabiAkiva, mongoose201

PermissionsExpand / Collapse

All times are GMT -5:00, Time now is 8:40am


Execution: 0.156. 12 queries. Compression Disabled.
© 2005 Take-Two Interactive Software and its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. Sid Meier's Civilization IV, Civ, Civilization, 2K Games, the 2K Games logo, and Take-Two Interactive Software are all trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. Developed by Firaxis Games. Firaxis Games and the Firaxis Games logo are a registered trademark of Firaxis Games, Inc.

web stats