|
| |
I am pot
      
Last Seen: 4/4/2006 6:06 PM
Posts: 1,670 Visits: 2,512
|
| As always I get the Canadian response to Bush's addresses... I wanted to see how they compare to the internaional community (which for me is you guys). Any comments on what he said and why he said it? Read the questions/points at the bottom and chip in 2 cents to wherever ya want.
I'll put some headline quotes from Canadian papers here:
Headline: Bush tries to rescue reputation President George W. Bush, facing an image crisis, admitted Thursday he failed Americans in the response to hurricane Katrina, pitched an anti-poverty plan and promised to pay the bulk of one of the world's largest reconstruction projects .... While Bush directed his Homeland Security Department to conduct an immediate review of emergency plans in every major city in America, he left many wondering why that hadn't already been done after 9-11.
And the president is facing Republican legislators anxious about the daily $2-billion US price tag for the Katrina cleanup, a cost that could eventually surpass the $300 billion US that's already been spent in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Big spending on the costliest natural disaster in U.S. history has raised serious questions about the finances of a country waging war and grappling with a huge deficit. .... Despite three trips to the ravaged coast and declaring Friday a national day of prayer and remembrance, his words have lacked the punch and impact of the moments that became iconic following the terrorist attacks Sept. 11, 2001.
Opinion surveys peg Bush at his lowest-ever approval rating. And they routinely suggest most blacks think the botched response is directly related to the poverty and race of area residents, a view most whites don't share.
.... Bush took particular care Thursday to address the racial divide that has split wide open again in the aftermath of Katrina, noting that the poverty exposed to the world "has roots in a history of racial discrimination which cut off generations from the opportunity of America."
"We have a duty to confront this poverty with bold action," he said. ...
Democrats are focused on the gains they might make in next year's congressional elections if the catastrophe nudges Americans toward a new level of social consciousness they advocate and away from a decades-long trend toward lower taxes, small government and a fend-for-yourself mentality.
...
Recent surveys suggest most Americans now want Bush to focus on domestic priorities, rather than the terrorism fight that has long been his strong suit. Nearly two-thirds said he does not share their priorities for the United States.
I realize in advance that this is coming from Canadian media, so it's pretty badly skewed to our direction (actually, is Canadian Conservative media here too... I'm kinda curious what the more liberal side goes at). I only quoted certain parts... Theres alot thats just quoting Bush and the sort that I omitted (I only took the points I wanted to bring up here).
So... 1. Are those poll rating true or am I being fed bull? How do people feel about Bush's ratings right now?
2. He went after the poverty portion pretty hard (I would have expected him to try to draw attention away from that actually). Comments? And the big question... Is he just saying this or will action actually be taken?
3. I like the fend-for-yourself comment at the bottom. To a Canadian reading that, it's almost an atrocity (what no help???). Hehe, I doubt thats the same opinion from peeps here though... Any comments on the move towards lower and lower gov't spending and lower taxes? Had more taxes been collecting, could more have been done to prevent this? Would you support a tax hike to increase disaster preparedness?
4. Bush's motives... Was this address simply an attempt to boost ratings or was he informing the public of anything new? (Addit to clarify, I've put this point on here as many news sources are saying this is simply an attempt to save face and not much else)
5. Any issues with the rate of spending for the recovery from Katrina? Is it time to look at and re-eval budget expenditures, or is it borrow the 300 billion and keep staying the path?
6. Similar idea as above... Is 300 billion a reasonable amount to spend on this recovery? Could it be done for less or will more be needed? Could it be spent differently? |
-- --- Shouldn't we be too concerned with terror and war to be discussing this right now? --- |  |  |
| |
| |
I am pot
      
Last Seen: 4/4/2006 6:06 PM
Posts: 1,670 Visits: 2,512
|
| | |
| |
Veteran Warlord
      
Last Seen: 10/6/2006 6:56 PM
Posts: 167 Visits: 2,025
|
| | |
| |
Telepathic Surgeon
      
Last Seen: 11/24/2008 9:01 AM
Posts: 1,887 Visits: 3,538
|
| | |
| |
Half A Potato
Last Seen: 10/16/2008 9:27 PM
Posts: 311 Visits: 4,930
|
| | |
| |
Grognard fantôme
Last Seen: Today @ 8:02 PM
Posts: 7,350 Visits: 9,706
|
| What reason would Bush have to care about his "image" given that he cannot run for President again?
. . . Oh yeah, I forgot, he IS the President, and solidarity behind the leader WOULD strengthen the nation.
That's an interesting amount of stuff Cuba putatively offered to send Garrison.
One of my classmates did her fieldwork down there. Surviving the dengue epidemic "that never happened" (on the books anyway) kinda changed her rosy view of that "utopia." Well, that and the palpable sense of anxiety about any open discussion among the people, as well as the relentless "research facilitators," who kept close tabs on her and her work.
It was quite poignant because she left the US equally a revolutionary as her radical left-wing advisor, but came back without much good to say about Cuba. What is even more putrid is, her advisor then sought to black ball her and keep her from finishing her dissertation. She eventually had toget a university review board to counter her advisors stonewalling. Talk about censorship!? But I guess if capitalism, and Republicans are "evil," then anything is justified, eh? |
-- "'The front' is wherever you stop running away. Get used to it. This is what modern warfare looks like." K T Cat |  |  |
| |
| |
Designated Norwegian
      
Last Seen: Today @ 6:23 PM
Posts: 3,346 Visits: 10,824
|
| | |
| |
General
Last Seen: Yesterday @ 11:48 PM
Posts: 3,798 Visits: 5,141
|
| | |
| |
Telepathic Surgeon
      
Last Seen: 11/24/2008 9:01 AM
Posts: 1,887 Visits: 3,538
|
| Well one thing is certain......only Cuba is guilty of propaganda......eh Scip? |
-- Always keep a diamond in your mine
|
|
|
|