I started the third term nomination thread,  as did Scipio at the beginning of the second term,  and I was insulted and met with demands that I must apologize to the court lest the thread be closed for being unconstitutional.  The thread was met with the approval of all but one person --- and after I refused to apologize to the court,  I was met with the thread being closed. 

The thread is constitutionally valid,  it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out.  However,  the very fact I was demanded to apologize,  is what is troubling.  It's nothing but overzealous and unneeded behavior from this Judge and I hereby call for his impeachement.

Before any vote can take place,  we must wait for the House of Scorpius to be filled.  In the mean time,  this area should be used as discussion.  I apologize for this negative but rightfully placed call.

Refference:
Nomination Thread: 3rd Term

The judge has also messaged me with the following:

Senator Bismarck, you are hereby accused and convicted by The Supreme Court of violation of The Constitution of this land.

I wish I had more time to write a bigger response here, but unfortunately I don't, as I'm at work.

I know you guys have had issues in the past, and they need to be left at the door.

I don't believe Biz was in any way trying to violate the constitution. The thread in question was an unofficial nomination thread, not an attempt at usurping the Supreme Court in holding a vote.

However, you two have a knack of rubbing each other up the wrong way, which cannot be beneficial at all for our DGame.

I'll have a think about this and get back to you later with a better response.

Cheers,

Dave

As I said,  it was obviously constiutional.  So what logical reason is there behind the actions?  Unless he was elected to troll the game's progress,  I don't see where I'm at fault.

This being a game,  I do expect to enjoy the same quality as everyone else,  not be at the end of some judge's criticism while they're sitting behind their computer on some ego-trip from a game.  What part of that is healthy for the game?  Especially when I've served three-terms and have yet to come into conflict with any other judge or citizen in general.

Biz, I understand why you are seeking impeachment but I don't believe it's an impeachable offense.  If he continues doing things like this, perhaps impeachment wouldn't be out of the question but this is a pretty small a thing to be impeached for.  Now, if Mr. G doesn't show up, it may be necessary to replace him in which case, I'd possibly run for judge in order to counter TORA, but we should give G a bit more time.

As for Mr. G being given more time... he's been gone more than a week.  If we want to declare him absent, now would be a good time.

The question is, is he abusing power?  The answer may be yes and that is for the senate to decide.  Whatever the case may be, you should be careful TORA.  You're walking on thin ice.